ClinicalCodes.org

An online clinical codes repository to improve validity and reproducibility of medical database research

Research article:

Examining variations in prescribing safety in UK general practice: a cross-sectional study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink

Reference:

S Jill Stocks, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Artur Akbarov, Sarah Rodger, Anthony J Avery, Darren M Ashcroft(2015) Examining variations in prescribing safety in UK general practice: a cross-sectional study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. BMJ, doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5501

Link to fulltext article
Abstract
Study question What is the prevalence of different types of potentially hazardous prescribing in general practice in the United Kingdom, and what is the variation between practices? Methods A cross sectional study included all adult patients potentially at risk of a prescribing or monitoring error defined by a combination of diagnoses and prescriptions in 526 general practices contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) up to 1 April 2013. Primary outcomes were the prevalence of potentially hazardous prescriptions of anticoagulants, anti-platelets, NSAIDs, β blockers, glitazones, metformin, digoxin, antipsychotics, combined hormonal contraceptives, and oestrogens and monitoring by blood test less frequently than recommended for patients with repeated prescriptions of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and loop diuretics, amiodarone, methotrexate, lithium, or warfarin. Study answer and limitations 49 927 of 949 552 patients at risk triggered at least one prescribing indicator (5.26%, 95% confidence interval 5.21% to 5.30%) and 21 501 of 182 721 (11.8%, 11.6% to 11.9%) triggered at least one monitoring indicator. The prevalence of different types of potentially hazardous prescribing ranged from almost zero to 10.2%, and for inadequate monitoring ranged from 10.4% to 41.9%. Older patients and those prescribed multiple repeat medications had significantly higher risks of triggering a prescribing indicator whereas younger patients with fewer repeat prescriptions had significantly higher risk of triggering a monitoring indicator. There was high variation between practices for some indicators.Though prescribing safety indicators describe prescribing patterns that can increase the risk of harm to the patient and should generally be avoided, there will always be exceptions where the indicator is clinically justified. Furthermore there is the possibility that some information is not captured by CPRD for some practices—for example, INR results in patients receiving warfarin. What this study adds The high prevalence for certain indicators emphasises existing prescribing risks and the need for their appropriate consideration within primary care, particularly for older patients and those taking multiple medications. The high variation between practices indicates potential for improvement through targeted practice level intervention.
Author for correspondence
Jill Stocks
Email for correspondence
jill.stocks@manchester.ac.uk

Code list: res25: M5_INR

12 codes in list

Code Coding system Description Entity type List name medcode
42QE.00 Read International normalised ratio test res25: M5_INR 71
42QE000 Read INR - international normal ratio normal test res25: M5_INR 14283
42QE100 Read INR - international normal ratio abnormal test res25: M5_INR 19844
42QE200 Read INR percentage time in therapeutic range test res25: M5_INR 107179
66Q7.00 Read Target international normalised ratio test res25: M5_INR 22222
66Q7000 Read INR (international normalised ratio) target range test res25: M5_INR 103563
66Q8.00 Read International normalised ratio deviation from target test res25: M5_INR 28975
66Q8000 Read International normalised ratio above target range test res25: M5_INR 107310
66Q9.00 Read Warfarin dose unchanged test res25: M5_INR 58558
66QC.00 Read Anticoagulation monitoring - secondary care test res25: M5_INR 55224
66QD.00 Read Anticoagulation monitoring - primary care test res25: M5_INR 74910
66QE.00 Read Self monitoring of international normalised ratio test res25: M5_INR 94663

0 comments have been posted.

Please log in to leave a comment.